This document serves as a comprehensive guide to operating a specific brand and type of electrotherapy device. It provides detailed instructions on setup, usage parameters, safety precautions, and troubleshooting procedures for devices manufactured by Chattanooga and utilized for delivering electrical stimulation. As an example, physical therapists would refer to this material to properly administer interferential current therapy for pain management.
The importance of this documentation lies in its ability to ensure safe and effective treatment outcomes. Properly followed instructions minimize the risk of adverse effects and maximize the therapeutic potential of the electrotherapy modality. Historically, such manuals represent a critical component of training and ongoing competency for healthcare professionals employing these devices, reflecting evolving best practices and technological advancements within the field of rehabilitation.
The subsequent sections will delve into specific topics covered within this type of resource, including electrode placement techniques, dosage guidelines, and contraindications for use. Furthermore, it will explore the various stimulation modes offered by the equipment and their respective clinical applications.
1. Device Operation
The “Chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” is inextricably linked to the correct execution of device operation. Failure to grasp the intricacies outlined within the manual’s sections on device operation inevitably leads to compromised treatment efficacy and potential patient risk. Consider the novice physical therapist tasked with administering neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to a patient recovering from a stroke. Without a thorough understanding of the device’s settings, waveform parameters, and cycle times, the therapist may inadvertently deliver stimulation that is either insufficient to elicit a muscle contraction or, conversely, so intense as to cause discomfort or skin irritation. In such cases, the carefully designed treatment plan becomes futile, and the patient’s rehabilitation is hindered rather than advanced.
The relationship between the manual and device operation extends beyond simply powering on the unit and selecting a pre-set program. The manual details the nuanced adjustments that are often necessary to tailor the stimulation to the individual patient’s needs. For example, differences in skin impedance, muscle fiber type, and pain threshold necessitate modifications to the stimulation intensity, pulse duration, and frequency. A therapist equipped with the knowledge contained within the manual can proactively address these variables, optimizing the treatment for maximum benefit. Moreover, proper understanding of the device’s self-testing and calibration procedures, outlined in the manual, ensures the accuracy and reliability of the output, preventing unexpected variations in the delivered stimulation that could compromise safety.
In summary, the “Chattanooga electrical stimulation manual’s” section on device operation serves as the bedrock for responsible and effective electrotherapy practice. Its comprehensive guidance minimizes the chance of error, promotes individualized treatment strategies, and safeguards patient well-being. The challenge lies not merely in possessing the manual, but in diligently studying and applying its principles to every treatment session, ensuring that the device operates not just as intended, but in a way that best serves the unique needs of each patient undergoing rehabilitation.
2. Safety Protocols
The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” becomes a shield when navigating the complex terrain of electrotherapy, and the adherence to safety protocols constitutes its strongest defense. Within its pages lies not merely a set of instructions, but a codified commitment to patient well-being. Consider a scenario: a bustling outpatient clinic where multiple patients are undergoing various forms of electrical stimulation concurrently. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” becomes the silent guardian, ensuring each practitioner understands the specific precautions for each modality and each patient.
-
Contraindication Awareness
The manual meticulously lists conditions that preclude the use of electrical stimulation. Cardiac pacemakers, pregnancy, and active malignancy serve as critical red flags. Failure to recognize these contraindications, readily available within the manual, could result in severe adverse events. The manual arms the practitioner with the knowledge to make informed decisions, preventing potentially life-threatening situations. For instance, applying electrical stimulation near a patient’s implanted pacemaker could disrupt its function, leading to cardiac arrhythmia.
-
Electrode Integrity and Placement
Compromised electrode pads or improper placement introduce the risk of skin irritation, burns, or ineffective treatment. The manual details the appropriate types of electrodes, their maintenance, and precise placement techniques for various conditions. Consider a scenario where a frayed electrode pad is used; the uneven current distribution could cause localized skin burns. The manual emphasizes the importance of regular inspection and adherence to recommended placement guidelines, minimizing these risks.
-
Dosage Parameter Monitoring
The therapeutic window for electrical stimulation is often narrow. Excessive intensity or duration can lead to muscle fatigue, pain, or even tissue damage. The manual provides clear guidelines on recommended dosage parameters and emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring during treatment. The manual helps to regulate treatment for each patient.
-
Equipment Maintenance and Calibration
The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” contains a strict checklist of maintenance and calibration procedures to uphold device accuracy. Compromised machinery, be it through malfunctioning voltage or current readings, or eroded wires, presents an eminent threat to predictable treatment. The documentation arms the operator with insights into recognizing and addressing any device defects, securing both patient and technician safety.
In essence, the safety protocols detailed within the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” are not merely suggestions but rather vital safeguards. By diligently adhering to these guidelines, practitioners transform what could be a risky intervention into a powerful tool for rehabilitation, fostering a safe and effective healing environment for their patients. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” is the resource ensuring the benefits outweigh the risks.
3. Electrode Placement
The precise positioning of electrodes dictates the efficacy of electrical stimulation, transforming the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” from a collection of technical specifications into a practical guide for therapeutic intervention. The manual’s diagrams and instructions become critical when considering the anatomical and physiological specifics of each patient. For example, stimulating the quadriceps muscle group post-knee surgery requires meticulous electrode placement to target the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO), a key stabilizer of the patella. A deviation of even a centimeter could inadvertently stimulate the vastus lateralis instead, leading to an imbalance in muscle activation and potentially hindering the patient’s rehabilitation progress. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” therefore, is not merely a suggestion, but a roadmap to achieving targeted therapeutic outcomes.
Beyond the anatomical considerations, understanding the principles of current density and tissue impedance becomes crucial. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” typically provides guidance on electrode size and spacing, factors that directly influence the depth and spread of the electrical field. Consider a patient with chronic lower back pain. Incorrect electrode placement might result in superficial stimulation, failing to reach the deeper paraspinal muscles responsible for spinal stability. Alternatively, electrodes placed too close together could lead to a high current density in a localized area, causing skin irritation and discomfort. The manual empowers the clinician to make informed decisions, optimizing the treatment parameters to minimize adverse effects while maximizing therapeutic benefit. Real-world examples include clinical studies assessing electrical stimulation for rotator cuff repair, where precise electrode placements based on the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” resulted in improved muscle strength and reduced pain compared to less standardized approaches.
In conclusion, the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual’s” section on electrode placement is not a mere appendix but an integral component that determines the success or failure of the entire electrotherapy intervention. It serves as a bridge between theoretical knowledge and practical application, guiding the clinician through the complexities of human anatomy and physiology to deliver targeted and effective electrical stimulation. The challenge lies not only in understanding the manual’s diagrams but also in applying that knowledge with clinical judgment, adapting the recommended placements to the individual needs of each patient. The combination is what ensures the right treatment.
4. Treatment Parameters
The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” ceases to be a mere collection of schematics and technical specifications when treatment parameters are considered. It evolves into a vital compass guiding therapists through the nuanced landscape of electrotherapy. Treatment parameters, defined by elements such as frequency, pulse duration, intensity, and waveform, are not arbitrary settings; they are the clinician’s tools for shaping the electrical stimulus to achieve specific therapeutic goals.
-
Frequency Modulation
Consider the scenario of a patient suffering from chronic pain. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” will detail how adjusting the frequency of the electrical stimulus can selectively target different nerve fibers. High-frequency stimulation, for instance, may preferentially activate A-beta fibers, effectively “closing the gate” on pain signals according to the gate control theory. Conversely, low-frequency stimulation might trigger the release of endogenous opioids, providing longer-lasting pain relief. Without a firm grasp of these principles, guided by the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” a clinician risks delivering ineffective or even counterproductive treatment.
-
Pulse Duration’s Impact
The width of each electrical pulse, measured in microseconds, significantly influences the type of tissue stimulated. Short pulse durations are typically used for sensory-level stimulation, aimed at pain modulation or sensory re-education. Longer pulse durations are required to depolarize motor nerves, eliciting muscle contractions. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” provides specific guidelines on pulse duration ranges for various therapeutic applications. A therapist treating muscle weakness, for instance, would need to select a pulse duration sufficient to recruit the target muscle fibers, while avoiding excessive stimulation that could lead to fatigue or discomfort.
-
Intensity Calibration
The magnitude of the electrical current, measured in milliamperes, dictates the strength of the physiological response. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” emphasizes the importance of careful intensity titration, gradually increasing the current until the desired effect is achieved. A therapist treating edema, for instance, would gradually increase the intensity until visible muscle contractions are observed, promoting lymphatic drainage and reducing swelling. The manual also cautions against exceeding the patient’s tolerance level, as excessive intensity can cause pain, muscle spasm, or even skin damage.
-
Waveform Selection
The shape of the electrical pulse influences the comfort and effectiveness of the stimulation. Symmetrical biphasic waveforms are often preferred for muscle strengthening, as they minimize the risk of skin irritation due to charge accumulation. Asymmetrical biphasic waveforms may be used for pain management, as they can selectively stimulate different nerve fibers. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” outlines the characteristics of various waveforms and their respective clinical applications. Selecting the appropriate waveform, guided by the manual, is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes and minimizing patient discomfort.
The connection between treatment parameters and the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” is not merely about following a set of instructions; it is about understanding the underlying principles of electrotherapy and applying them with clinical judgment. Imagine a concert violinist with their instrument, the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” acts as their sheet music, and the correct manipulation of treatment parameters creates a symphony of healing. It requires a deep understanding of the instrument, the score, and the desired outcome. This understanding, fostered by diligent study of the manual, empowers clinicians to tailor electrotherapy interventions to the specific needs of each patient, maximizing therapeutic benefit and minimizing the risk of adverse effects.
5. Troubleshooting
Troubleshooting, in the context of electrotherapy devices, emerges not as a mere inconvenience but as a critical intersection where technical proficiency meets patient care. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” transforms from a static document into a dynamic problem-solving resource when confronted with equipment malfunctions or unexpected patient responses. Consider the silence that descends when a device fails mid-treatment, and the therapist must act swiftly to assess and rectify the issue.
-
Error Code Decipherment
Modern electrotherapy units often display cryptic error codes when faced with internal faults. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” functions as a decoder, translating these codes into actionable insights. For example, an “E07” code might indicate a faulty electrode connection. Without the manual, the therapist would be left guessing, potentially prolonging the interruption and causing unnecessary anxiety for the patient. The manual offers a pathway to resolution, transforming ambiguity into clarity.
-
Signal Integrity Verification
Sometimes, the issue is not a complete failure but a degradation of the electrical signal. The patient might report a weaker-than-expected sensation, or the muscle contraction might be suboptimal. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” provides guidance on how to verify the integrity of the output signal using testing devices. It instructs on interpreting the data to determine if the device is delivering the correct voltage and current, ensuring the therapeutic intervention remains effective.
-
Component Functionality Assessment
Electrotherapy devices are composed of numerous interconnected components, any of which could fail. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” may provide diagrams and instructions for assessing the functionality of individual components, such as power supplies, circuit boards, and output channels. This allows the therapist, often in conjunction with a qualified technician, to pinpoint the source of the problem and potentially implement a repair, minimizing downtime.
-
Patient Feedback Interpretation
It is useful to understand the patient’s feedback. The ‘chattanooga electrical stimulation manual’ provides instructions to determine if the patient’s feedback is reasonable or not and whether it should be related to some error in settings or some technical errors.
-
Safety Override Procedures
In rare cases, a device may malfunction in a way that poses a direct risk to the patient. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” should outline safety override procedures, allowing the therapist to immediately terminate the stimulation and safely disconnect the patient from the device. This ensures that even in the face of unforeseen circumstances, patient well-being remains paramount.
The relationship between troubleshooting and the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” transcends mere reference. It represents a commitment to preparedness, ensuring that clinicians can effectively respond to unexpected challenges and maintain the integrity of the therapeutic process. The manual, in this context, is not just a guide; it is a lifeline.
6. Maintenance
The enduring functionality of electrotherapy equipment hinges upon diligent maintenance, a concept inextricably interwoven with the instructions within the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual.” A story often circulates within seasoned physiotherapy departments, recounting the tale of a neglected unit. Electrodes, frayed from overuse, delivered inconsistent currents. Wires, worn from repeated bending, sparked intermittently. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” unopened and unheeded, lay forgotten on a shelf as the machine’s performance degraded, ultimately leading to inaccurate treatments and frustrated patients. This anecdote serves as a stark reminder that neglecting maintenance, as outlined in the manual, has tangible consequences. The inverse is also true. Regular cleaning of electrode surfaces, cable inspections, and adherence to the manual’s calibration schedule ensures the delivery of consistent and precise therapeutic interventions.
The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” serves as the definitive guide for preventative maintenance. It specifies the frequency of cleaning, the appropriate cleaning agents, and the procedures for inspecting cables, electrodes, and power cords. It also details the recommended schedule for calibration, a process crucial for verifying the accuracy of the device’s output. For instance, the manual might stipulate that the output intensity should be calibrated every six months, using a calibrated multimeter, to ensure that the displayed current matches the actual current delivered. Performing these procedures, guided by the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” minimizes the risk of equipment malfunction and extends the lifespan of the device. One can imagine the consequences of failing to replace a worn power cord, as recommended in the manual, it risks becoming an arc and cause a fire. Or skipping the cleaning routine will cause the electrodes to get degraded and contaminated. Proper maintenance ensures the benefits outweigh the risks.
Ultimately, the relationship between the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” and maintenance extends beyond mere compliance; it embodies a commitment to patient safety and treatment efficacy. While the initial cost of the equipment may be substantial, the long-term investment in proper maintenance, as detailed in the manual, ensures that the device continues to deliver reliable and effective therapeutic interventions for years to come. Challenges may arise in implementing a consistent maintenance schedule within busy clinical settings. However, prioritizing equipment maintenance, guided by the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” is not merely a logistical task but a fundamental aspect of responsible clinical practice. It exemplifies the principle that effective electrotherapy is not solely dependent on advanced technology but also on the meticulous care and attention to detail outlined in the manufacturer’s instructions.
7. Contraindications
The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” serves as a guardian against unintended harm. Within its pages, the section on contraindications acts as a crucial filter, delineating the boundaries beyond which the application of electrical stimulation becomes a hazard rather than a therapy. The absence of this critical consideration, or a disregard for its tenets, can precipitate consequences ranging from minor discomfort to life-threatening events. A story is told of a young athlete with undiagnosed thrombophlebitis who received electrical stimulation for a minor muscle strain. The resulting dislodgement of a blood clot led to a pulmonary embolism, a near-fatal consequence directly attributable to the violation of a fundamental contraindication clearly outlined in the relevant instruction manual. This account highlights the grave importance of diligently observing these prohibitions, transforming the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” from a mere operating guide into a vital instrument for patient safety. The contraindications are the alarm to warn the practitioner.
The relationship between specific contraindications and the underlying mechanisms of potential harm is also detailed in the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual.” For example, the presence of a cardiac pacemaker is a common contraindication. The manual explains how external electrical fields can interfere with the pacemaker’s function, potentially leading to erratic heart rhythms or complete device malfunction. Similarly, the manual clarifies the risks associated with applying electrical stimulation over areas of active malignancy, explaining how the induced electrical currents could accelerate tumor growth or metastasis. These detailed explanations empower clinicians to make informed decisions, tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs while scrupulously avoiding potentially dangerous interventions. Without “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual”, these patients could face the danger of life.
In summary, the section on contraindications within the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” is not a peripheral detail but a cornerstone of responsible electrotherapy practice. It protects vulnerable patients, provides crucial insights into the mechanisms of harm, and empowers clinicians to make informed decisions. The challenges in implementing these guidelines often lie in recognizing subtle or undiagnosed conditions. However, vigilance and a commitment to thorough patient assessment, coupled with a diligent adherence to the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” are essential to uphold the ethical imperative of “first, do no harm.” The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” ensures practitioners follow the fundamental code of conduct, protecting the patients.
Frequently Asked Questions
Electrotherapy, while a potent tool in rehabilitation, invites inquiries stemming from its complexity and potential for misuse. The following questions, rooted in real-world scenarios, address common concerns and misconceptions encountered by practitioners navigating the intricate landscape of electrical stimulation. Each response is informed by the principles and guidelines contained within the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual”, providing clarity and promoting safe, effective application.
Question 1: Can electrical stimulation exacerbate existing pain conditions?
The narrative unfolds in a pain management clinic. A patient presented with chronic lower back pain, exhibiting anxiety about commencing electrotherapy. The patient had heard anecdotal instances of individuals experiencing heightened discomfort following electrical stimulation. Guided by the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” the clinician meticulously assessed the patient, identifying the specific pain generators and adjusting parameters. The manual emphasizes the importance of starting with low-intensity stimulation and gradually increasing it based on patient tolerance. The electrotherapy was beneficial to his recovery.
Question 2: Is it safe to apply electrical stimulation over metal implants?
The scene shifts to a post-surgical rehabilitation unit. A patient with a total knee arthroplasty expressed apprehension about receiving electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening. The patient feared that the metallic implant would conduct electricity, leading to localized heating or other adverse effects. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” serves as the definitive guide, which generally advises against direct electrode placement over metal implants due to potential current concentration and tissue heating. The therapy was applied according to what was advised on the manual.
Question 3: How does a clinician determine the appropriate electrode size for different muscle groups?
The setting transitions to a sports medicine clinic. A therapist, faced with treating a highly conditioned athlete, questioned the impact of electrode size on the stimulation of a large muscle group like the hamstrings. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” outlines the correlation between electrode size, current density, and the depth of tissue penetration. Larger electrodes distribute the current over a wider area, reducing the current density and minimizing the risk of skin irritation. The instructions in the manual helped the therapist, avoiding any possible incidents.
Question 4: What are the warning signs of overstimulation during electrical muscle stimulation?
The drama unfolds in a neurological rehabilitation center. A patient recovering from a stroke began displaying signs of muscle fatigue and spasm during neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). The experienced therapist recognized the signs of overstimulation, as detailed in the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual.” The therapist reduced the intensity and duration of stimulation, preventing any long-term damage.
Question 5: Can electrical stimulation cause skin burns?
The narrative takes a cautionary turn. A case study revealed a patient experiencing minor skin burns following prolonged electrical stimulation. Investigation revealed the technician had failed to inspect the electrodes, as mandated by the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual.” The therapist inspected the electrodes regularly to avoid such accidents.
Question 6: Are there specific populations for whom electrical stimulation is generally not recommended?
The question arises in a geriatric care setting. The team discussed the suitability of electrical stimulation for an elderly patient with multiple comorbidities. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” contains the instructions and directions for such situations.
The preceding responses underscore the critical role of the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” in navigating the complexities of electrotherapy. By addressing common questions and grounding answers in established protocols, it fosters safe, evidence-based practice and ensures the well-being of patients undergoing electrical stimulation. The manual is not just some book, it is important in electrotherapy.
The subsequent section delves deeper into practical applications, providing specific case studies illustrating the integration of manual guidelines into routine clinical practice.
Navigating the Labyrinth
The effective use of electrical stimulation transcends mere button-pushing; it requires a nuanced understanding of the equipment and its potential impact on the patient. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” becomes an indispensable compass, guiding practitioners through the complexities of this powerful modality. However, mastering its content necessitates more than rote memorization. The following pointers, gleaned from seasoned clinicians and the hard-won lessons of practice, offer valuable insights for enhancing both safety and therapeutic outcomes.
Tip 1: Champion the Chart Meticulous Documentation
A physiotherapist new to the world of electrotherapy once lamented, “I followed the manual to the letter, but the patient regressed.” Upon reviewing the case, it was discovered that crucial details – electrode placement, stimulation parameters, and patient response – had been sparsely documented. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” emphasizes the importance of comprehensive documentation, a shield against ambiguity and a cornerstone of accountability. Every variable, every adjustment, must be meticulously recorded. This not only facilitates continuity of care but also serves as a critical resource for identifying and addressing any adverse reactions.
Tip 2: Embrace the Subtle Sign Prioritize Patient Feedback
The manual, while comprehensive, cannot account for the unique physiology and subjective experience of each patient. A therapist, blinded by preconceived notions, once dismissed a patient’s complaint of “prickling sensations” as mere anxiety. Further investigation revealed the use of a compromised electrode pad, leading to localized skin irritation. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” stresses the importance of attentive listening and proactive inquiry. Even subtle changes in sensation, often dismissed as trivial, can be harbingers of underlying issues. Patient feedback should serve as a constant feedback loop, refining treatment and preventing potential harm.
Tip 3: Respect the Resistor Skin Preparation is Paramount
A common error stems from failing to address the variable of skin impedance. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” will mention the use of cleaning the skin before placing electrodes on it. Proper cleaning removes dead skin cells and oils, lowering skin impedance and enabling improved conduction.
Tip 4: Adhere to Anatomical Accuracy – Electrode Placement
A new therapist attempted to deliver quadriceps stimulation to a knee replacement patient, but he overlooked the position of the joint and the angle it created. The positioning of the electrodes in an anatomically precise position is what is to be expected from therapists, and this precision is often found in the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual”.
Tip 5: Regularly Review Regulations – Staying updated on Legal standards.
The advice in manuals is often derived from recent and relevant legal decisions. For any therapist looking to use an electrical stimulation instrument, keeping up to date with legal standards helps the practice. This is often reiterated in most manuals, “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” included.
By prioritizing meticulous documentation, attentive listening, diligent skin preparation, regular equipment inspection, and collaborative communication, practitioners can unlock the full potential of electrical stimulation while mitigating the risk of harm. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual,” in this context, is not merely a reference guide but a roadmap for responsible and effective practice.
With a commitment to safety and a focus on individual patient needs, the therapeutic use of electrical stimulation transcends the technical, becoming an art form guided by both science and compassion. The subsequent conclusion will summarize this approach.
The Final Circuit
The exploration of the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” reveals a document far exceeding its physical dimensions. It represents a compendium of knowledge, a guardian of safety, and a facilitator of effective therapeutic intervention. The careful unspooling of its contents, from the fundamentals of device operation to the critical importance of contraindications, highlights the responsibility borne by those who wield the power of electrical stimulation. The narrative woven throughout this discoursethe cautionary tales of neglected equipment, misinterpreted patient feedback, and deviations from established protocolsserves as a potent reminder of the consequences of negligence. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” is not merely a reference tool; it is an ethical compass, guiding practitioners through the complexities of electrotherapy with the intent of maximizing benefit and minimizing harm.
Let this understanding serve as a call to action. Beyond the memorization of technical specifications and the rote application of treatment parameters, let diligence be the guiding principle. Let the “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” be not a dusty tome relegated to a forgotten shelf, but a well-worn companion, consulted with regularity and reverence. The future of electrotherapy lies not solely in technological advancement but in the unwavering commitment to responsible and ethical practice, ensuring that the power to heal remains forever tempered by the wisdom to do no harm. The “chattanooga electrical stimulation manual” is the base line for electrical stimulations.
